[Xotcl] Re: [Xotcl] re: Method inheritance on class side
setok at fishpool.com
Tue Apr 24 20:25:23 CEST 2001
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
> What is the opinion of the community? Do you need/want such
> an extended "inheritable proc" or a new language-consttruct?
> Did you face this problem already, and if yes, was it hard/inelegant
> to solve?
Personally I've never had the need for it (per-object procs were fine).
Usually I'd always want to keep a language as simple as possible. Of
course if I had a need for such a structure then maybe I would change
my stance, but until it becomes very common I'm probably content with
the current system.
- ---------- = = ---------//--+
| / Kristoffer Lawson | www.fishpool.fi|.com
+-> | setok at fishpool.com | - - --+------
|-- Fishpool Creations Ltd - / |
+-------- = - - - = --------- /~setok/
More information about the Xotcl