[Xotcl] TIP #257 & XOTcl as an OO framework

[Kristoffer Lawson]

On 5 Oct 2006, at 02:07, Gustaf Neumann wrote:

For what it's worth, I definitely think the two-levelled approach  
makes sense. Get as dynamic a core as possible, which will benefit  
all extensions, then build stuff on top of it. However, I also think  
there should be a simple and powerful user-level OO facility packaged  
with the core distribution, so there is at least one that is always  
there. The best is if both happen at once. I'm right now inclined to  
believe a prototype object system could well provide that.

In any case, if your proposal gains some support, as it probably  
will, TIP it :-)

            /  http://www.fishpool.com/~setok/