[Xotcl] possible bug?

Krzysztof Frukacz frukacz.krzysztof at gmail.com
Mon Jan 10 21:38:43 CET 2011


On 01/10/2011 05:10 PM, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
>   Dear Krzysztof, you did not include tester.tcl. Without it is hard to
> help you... -gustaf
>

Hello,

Once again - all the files.
The problem: in init of class ExtendedContainer there is a call for two 
procs: testA and testB. Both should work, because tmp1 is an object of 
class B (which contains testB) which has superclass A (which contains 
testA). However the call for testB works, but testA doesn't. Why?
Thank you for you help.

Best regards
-- 
Krzysztof Frukacz
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: a.xotcl
URL: <http://alice.wu-wien.ac.at/pipermail/xotcl/attachments/20110110/95177da8/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: b.xotcl
URL: <http://alice.wu-wien.ac.at/pipermail/xotcl/attachments/20110110/95177da8/attachment-0001.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: c.xotcl
URL: <http://alice.wu-wien.ac.at/pipermail/xotcl/attachments/20110110/95177da8/attachment-0002.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: extendedContainer.xotcl
URL: <http://alice.wu-wien.ac.at/pipermail/xotcl/attachments/20110110/95177da8/attachment-0003.ksh>


More information about the Xotcl mailing list