[Xotcl] Re: [Xotcl] Re: [Xotcl] Using source with the xodoc tool / Debian

[uwe.zdun at uni-essen.de]

>>>>> "KL" == Kristoffer Lawson <setok at fishpool.com> writes:
KL> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 uwe.zdun at uni-essen.de wrote:
>> we could also merge components that are split across files into one
>> documentation file.  I'm not sure which solution is the best one ...
>> what do you think?

KL> I think the best behaviour would be a combination of the two given
KL> possibilities:

KL> Each code file does get its own documentation file, but there is one
KL> package documentation file that lists which files are part of the
KL> packages. This document file would then link to the per-file document
KL> files.

yeah, that sounds sensible. I take a look at how we can realize this
behavior conveniently ... 

KL> On another issue we have made Debian packages of XOTcl (0.82, but 0.83 is
KL> on the way) if someone is interested.. They're not extensively tested but
KL> they seem to work on the machines here. Probably candidates for merging
KL> into the official Debian system at some later time.
>> 
>> great! if you like to maintain Debian packages & have a web page for
>> them, we can link this page with the XOTcl download page?

KL> Yeah, we should still test them on a clean machine and if that works
KL> then we can stick them up somewhere. I'll get back to you once we've
KL> done that. There shouldn't be any major problems anyway. I just 
KL> did a "dpkg -i" for the 0.83 package and except for a minor issue with
KL> pkgIndex.tcl it seems to be working.

ok. just drop us a note, when you're through with it

--Uwe

-- 
Uwe Zdun
Specification of Software Systems, University of Essen
Phone: +49 201 81 00 332, Fax: +49 201 81 00 398
zdun at xotcl.org, uwe.zdun at uni-essen.de