Oops (was Re: [Xotcl] Bug: make install step tries to perform chmod on xowish even if not configured to build [PATCH])

Jeff Hobbs jeffh at ActiveState.com
Sat Apr 10 22:51:45 CEST 2004


Gustaf Neumann wrote:
>  i get the impression you are fixing things that are not broken
>  in the general distribution. The configure stuff is 
>  defined to produces always a file xotclsh or xowish, no 
>  matter whether you compile with or without --with-xotclsh.

This is just plain wrong.  Drop the mega-binary idea.  It is
dead, dead, dead, dead.  Tcl has had a very good dll mechanism
for 7 years - all extensions should use it.  So IMO Jim is
fixing a configure system that *is* broken, at its very core
design.  You can do so much more with a pure extension, that
should always be the default.

-- 
     Jeff Hobbs, The Tcl Guy
     http://www.ActiveState.com/, a division of Sophos



More information about the Xotcl mailing list