No subject

Thu Oct 14 10:26:15 CEST 2004

when compiling the distributed binaries.  Is there a reason
why not?  It seems like it is a low cost (simply add the 
"-DUSE_TCL_STUBS" compile switch?) thing to do in order to
get the benefit of distributing more widely usable binaries.

Thanks,
Brian Theado

------_=_NextPart_001_01C15893.671068D0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: xotcl and tclkit</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:07:31 +0200, Gustaf Neumann wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; the xotcl binaries are built with tcl 8.3.2.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; therefore it should work without compiling only with</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; 8.3.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; however, when it is compiled with 8.4, it will work.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>I remember that stubs support was recently added to xotcl.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From the above, I gather stubs support is not being used</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>when compiling the distributed binaries.&nbsp; Is there a reason</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>why not?&nbsp; It seems like it is a low cost (simply add the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&quot;-DUSE_TCL_STUBS&quot; compile switch?) thing to do in order to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>get the benefit of distributing more widely usable binaries.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Brian Theado</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C15893.671068D0--