[Xotcl] XOtcl 1.3 bug
Kristoffer Lawson
setok at fishpool.com
Wed Oct 6 23:45:21 CEST 2004
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
> Hi Attilio,
> if i would be Mr Spock, i would say "fascinating".
>
> The example can be simplified to:
>
> set pippo 1
> Object o
> puts [o exists pippo]
> Object o::p
> puts [o exists pippo]
>
> and was like this already at least in 0.9 (in 2001),
> most likely as well in all versions supporting "exists".
Oop, I think I noticed something like this too but forgot to report it as
I made a workaround. Bad me :-)
(Need to look at that segmentation fault thing again as soon as I have
time)
/ http://www.fishpool.com/~setok/
More information about the Xotcl
mailing list